Anti-detect browsers
AdsPower
Anti-detect browser with profile management and automation; covered as a concept, not promoted.
Some links on this page are affiliate links. If you buy through them we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you. It never decides what we recommend. How we make money
What it does
AdsPower is an anti-detect browser: an application that runs many isolated browser profiles, each with its own fingerprint, cookies and proxy, so websites see each profile as a separate device. As of September 2026 the vendor's homepage calls it "The #1 Anti-detect Browser Trusted By 10M+ Users", a claim we have not verified, and lists ecommerce and dropshipping, affiliate marketing and social media management as use cases (adspower.com).
It adds automation on top of profile isolation: an RPA tool for recorded actions, a window synchronizer that repeats actions across profiles, and a local API.
We describe it as a concept because affiliates encounter it often. We do not promote or monetise it.
Who it is for
Legitimate uses exist: ecommerce sellers or agencies who must keep several client logins separated, testers checking a site across locales, and teams that need repeatable browser automation. Many of those needs are also met by ordinary browser profiles or standard automation tools.
It is not for affiliates who want to keep advertising after an ad account or business manager ban, or to run many accounts that hide a single advertiser behind them. That use is what the platforms' circumvention rules target, and the software does not change the outcome once accounts are linked.
Pros and cons
Pros
- Separate fingerprints and storage per profile.
- Built-in automation for repeated browser tasks.
Cons
- Running many accounts this way breaches Google and Meta terms.
- Linked accounts and payment methods tend to be banned together.
- Automated actions can look coordinated to platform risk systems.
How it works
Each profile holds a fingerprint (browser kernel, screen, fonts, WebGL, time zone and similar), a cookie store and a proxy. AdsPower offers Chrome and Firefox based kernels, per its pricing page as of September 2026.
The automation layer is what separates it from a plain multi-profile browser. RPA scripts repeat recorded steps inside profiles, the synchronizer mirrors one window's actions to many others, and the Local API lets external scripts open and drive profiles. The pricing page lists API rate limits by tier, for example 900 requests a minute on Business and 1,500 on Enterprise.
Ad platforms detect linked accounts through more than fingerprints: payment details, verification documents, behaviour, domains and creatives. Automation that repeats identical actions across profiles can itself become a signal.
Setup effort
The software installs quickly, and profile creation is a form. The ongoing work is sourcing proxies, keeping profiles consistent, and writing or recording automation. All of that effort sits on top of the policy problem described below rather than solving it. This site does not use or promote anti-detect browsers and explains them only as a concept.
Teams usually add a proxy provider, a profile naming scheme and someone who maintains the automation scripts when websites change. That is a standing cost in time, and it grows with the number of profiles rather than with results.
Strengths
As software, AdsPower's automation is its distinguishing feature. The RPA tool, window synchronizer and local API let a team run repetitive browser tasks across many isolated sessions, which is useful for legitimate jobs such as checking how a store appears in several markets or managing separate client accounts.
Team roles and permissions let an agency give staff access to specific profiles without sharing passwords. A free plan with 2 profiles is listed as of September 2026, so the concept can be examined without cost.
None of these strengths make multi-account evasion safe or permitted. They describe the tool, not a recommendation.
The choice of Chrome and Firefox kernels also lets testers compare how a site behaves in two engines from one interface.
Limitations
The decisive limitation is the terms of the platforms it is most often used against. Google's circumventing systems policy covers multiple account abuse and states that accounts "will be suspended upon detection and without prior warning". Meta's circumventing systems policy says it will "restrict or remove accounts that are used to egregiously or persistently violate our policies", and its account integrity rules extend to linked business assets. Checked in September 2026.
When detection happens, the loss is rarely one account. Linked business managers, pages and payment methods go together, often with remaining spend.
Automation raises the stakes: repeating the same actions across profiles can itself look coordinated.
The pricing page lists prices as of October 2026: Free at $0 for 2 profiles, Professional from $9 a month on monthly billing (10 profiles), Business at $61 a month, and Enterprise on request. Quarterly billing is 15 percent off and annual billing 40 percent off, which brings Professional to $5.40 and Business to $36.60 a month. In September 2026 the page ran a 50 percent annual sale instead, so discounts move; check the page on the day you buy.
Pricing, in context
Plans are tiered by profile count, team members and automation access: Free (2 profiles), Professional (10 to 100 profiles), Business (adds synchronizer, RPA and local API) and Enterprise (5,000 or more profiles), per the September 2026 pricing page. The facts tab carries the prices quoted above with their check date. As with any tool in this category, the subscription is small next to proxies, replacement accounts and spend lost to bans.
Check whether the automation features you need sit only on the Business tier before comparing plans.
When to pick an alternative
Dolphin Anty is the closest equivalent and is marketed more narrowly at ad account work. For legitimate separation, standard browser profiles and ordinary automation frameworks cover most needs without fingerprint spoofing.
For advertisers, the lasting alternative is a small number of verified accounts kept in good standing. The antidetect category covers the concept in more depth.
If an account keeps getting restricted, read the platform's stated reason and fix the ad, page or offer. That is cheaper than any tool that tries to hide the pattern.
Alternatives to AdsPower
- Dolphin AntyBoth are desktop anti-detect browsers for managing many profiles; the choice is about features and team plans.
Our verdict
AdsPower is an anti-detect browser with stronger automation than most in its category. We describe it so readers understand what it is, not as a recommendation.
Using it to run ad accounts that a platform would not allow, or to return after a ban, breaks Google's and Meta's terms, and detection means suspended accounts and business managers, usually without warning. Automation does not reduce that risk. We do not link to it commercially and do not suggest adopting it for advertising.
Readers who need profile isolation for legitimate agency work should first check whether standard browser profiles already solve it.
Traffic sources it works with
- Facebook AdsTeams buying Facebook ads use AdsPower to keep each ad account in a separate profile with its own fingerprint and proxy.